4.8 Article

In utero gene editing for monogenic lung disease

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 488, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav8375

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [2 T32 HL007586, HL134745, HL132999, HL119436]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH
  3. Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics at the University of Pennsylvania [UL1-TR001878]
  4. Orphan Disease Center at the University of Pennsylvania [GE-16-001-IU]
  5. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA Merit Review) [1I01BX001176]
  6. Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation
  7. Nemours Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monogenic lung diseases that are caused by mutations in surfactant genes of the pulmonary epithelium are marked by perinatal lethal respiratory failure or chronic diffuse parenchymal lung disease with few therapeutic options. Using a CRISPR fluorescent reporter system, we demonstrate that precisely timed in utero intra-amniotic delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing reagents during fetal development results in targeted and specific gene editing in fetal lungs. Pulmonary epithelial cells are predominantly targeted in this approach, with alveolar type 1, alveolar type 2, and airway secretory cells exhibiting high and persistent gene editing. We then used this in utero technique to evaluate a therapeutic approach to reduce the severity of the lethal interstitial lung disease observed in a mouse model of the human SFTPCI73T mutation. Embryonic expression of Sftpc(I73T) alleles is characterized by severe diffuse parenchymal lung damage and rapid demise of mutant mice at birth. After in utero CRISPR-Cas9-mediated inactivation of the mutant Sftpc(I73T) gene, fetuses and postnatal mice showed improved lung morphology and increased survival. These proof-of-concept studies demonstrate that in utero gene editing is a promising approach for treatment and rescue of monogenic lung diseases that are lethal at birth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据