4.8 Review

Rewilding complex ecosystems

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 364, 期 6438, 页码 351-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav5570

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig - German Research Foundation [FZT 118]
  2. Carlsberg Foundation (Semper Ardens project MegaPast2Future) [CF16-0005]
  3. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) [SFRH/BPD/80747/2011]
  4. FARSYD project [PTDC/AAG-REC/5007/2014-POCI-01-01-0145-FEDER-016664]
  5. Juan de la Cierva Incorporacion of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [IJCI-2014-20744]
  6. Vicepresidencia y Consejeria de Innovacion, Investigacion y Turismo of the Govern de les Illes Balears [PD/039/2017]
  7. CEH NC project [NEC06895]
  8. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CGL2014-53308-P]
  9. Madrid government [S2013/MAE-2719 REMEDINAL-3]
  10. Belmont Forum
  11. VILLUM FONDEN (VILLUM Investigator project) [16549]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The practice of rewilding has been both promoted and criticized in recent years. Benefits include flexibility to react to environmental change and the promotion of opportunities for society to reconnect with nature. Criticisms include the lack of a clear conceptualization of rewilding, insufficient knowledge about possible outcomes, and the perception that rewilding excludes people from landscapes. Here, we present a framework for rewilding that addresses these concerns. We suggest that rewilding efforts should target trophic complexity, natural disturbances, and dispersal as interacting processes that can improve ecosystem resilience and maintain biodiversity. We propose a structured approach to rewilding projects that includes assessment of the contributions of nature to people and the social-ecological constraints on restoration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据