4.4 Article

Relationship between MEG global dynamic functional network connectivity measures and symptoms in schizophrenia

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 129-134

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.05.007

关键词

Magnetoencephalography; Resting state; Schizophrenia; Functional connectivity

资金

  1. National Institute on General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [P20GM103472]
  2. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism of the National Institutes of Health [K01AA021431]
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging And Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health [R01EB006841, R01REB020407]
  4. National Science Foundation [1539067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An investigation of differences in dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) of healthy controls (HC) versus that of schizophrenia patients (SP) was completed, using eyes-open resting state MEG data. The MEG analysis utilized a source-space activity estimate (MNE/dSPM) whose result was the input to a group spatial independent component analysis (ICA), on which the networks of our MEG dFNC analysis were based. We have previously reported that our MEG dFNC revealed that SP change between brain meta-states (repeating patterns of network correlations which are allowed to overlap in time) significantly more often and to states which arc more different, relative to HC. Here, we extend our previous work to investigate the relationship between symptomology in SP and four meta-state metrics. We found a significant correlation between positive symptoms and the two meta-state metrics which showed significant differences between HC and SP. These two statistics quantified 1) how often individuals change state and 2) the total distance traveled within the state-space. We additionally found that a clustering of the meta-state metrics divides SP into groups which vary in symptomology. These results indicate specific relationships between symptomology and brain function for SP. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据