4.7 Article

Applications of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and the Strain Gage Method for Measuring Dynamic Mode I Fracture Parameters of the White Marble Specimen

期刊

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
卷 52, 期 11, 页码 4203-4216

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-019-01830-8

关键词

Digital image correlation (DIC); Strain gage; Dynamic stress intensity factor (DSIF); Dynamic three-point bending; White marble material

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC060090X]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Digital image correlation (DIC) and the strain gage method are both widely used in characterizing the fracture mechanisms of materials. However, the quantitative comparisons of rock fracture parameters between the two methods have been studied insufficiently. In this paper, dynamic three-point bending impact tests were performed on white marble specimens using DIC and the strain gage method simultaneously. The complete cracking process was recorded by two high-speed cameras situated on either side of the specimen. The crack propagation velocities were obtained and the dynamic stress intensity factors (DSIFs) were calculated by both methods for analysis and comparison. The experimental results show that the crack propagation velocities almost remain constant during the cracking process, and the evolutions of strain values recorded by gages are consistent with the modified strain variations obtained theoretically. DSIFs calculated by DIC show good agreement with the results obtained from strain gages #1 to #4, while the size effect and the multiple stress waves interfere with the strain signals sensed in strain gage #5, causing a relatively larger deviation in the DSIF. In addition, the complete fracture process (including the variations in successive displacement and strain fields) can be obtained by the DIC method, while a rough changing trend in the DSIF can be given by the strain gage method with a limited number of strain gages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据