4.7 Article

Decision making for sustainable aggregation of clean energy in day-ahead market: Uncertainty and risk

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 692-702

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.054

关键词

Decision-making; Renewable energy sources; Risk analysis; Storage management

资金

  1. Millennium BCP Foundation
  2. European Union through the European Regional Development Fund
  3. COMPETE 2020 (Operational Program Competitiveness and Internationalization) through the ICT project [UID/GEO/04683/2013, POCI010145-FEDER007690]
  4. Portuguese Funds through the Foundation for Science and Technology-FCT under the project LAETA 2015-2020 [UID/EMS/50022/2013]
  5. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [UID/EEA/04131/2013]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/EEA/04131/2013, UID/GEO/04683/2013] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper addresses a strategy for decision-making of sustainable aggregation for clean energy participating in a day-ahead electricity market. The clean energy consists of wind turbines, photovoltaic arrays and energy storage, contributing to a better resilience of the system. The power delivered by a wind turbine or by a photovoltaic array is most certainly in deviation from the value associated with the bid accepted at a closing of a day-ahead electricity market. The deviation is due to the unpredicted variable nature of the respective sources of energy, leading to uncertainty and may imply a risk of loss of profit. So, uncertainty must be considered, and the addressed strategy considers uncertainty by scenarios of historical data and risk by the conditional value at risk. The strategy is a unified approach based on a risk-constrained and a two-stage stochastic optimization problem rewritten as a mixed-integer linear programming problem. A case study is presented to illustrate the main result and drive conclusions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据