4.7 Article

Experimental study on the thermal performance of a novel ultra-thin aluminum flat heat pipe

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 1133-1143

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.097

关键词

Ultra-thin heat pipe; Thermal management; Aluminum fiber; Thermal resistance; Inclination angle

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51735004]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, China [2014A030312017]
  3. Science and Technology Plan of Guangdong, China [2017A010104006, 2017KZ010105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a novel ultra-thin aluminum flat heat pipe with thickness of 1.5 mm for the first time in order to satisfy the ever increasing requirements for cost-effective, physically compact and highly efficient thermal management solutions. The extruded aluminum tube contains multiple separate micro cavities that work as independent micro heat pipes and a two-level compressing process is applied to flatten the tube to the ideal thickness. Sintered aluminum fibers and aluminum fiber meshes with surface treatment are inserted into each cavity of the ultra-thin heat pipe as the extra wicks for comparison. The thermal response characteristics of the fabricated aluminum heat pipes, including the temperature uniformity, thermal resistance, and effects of wick structure and inclination angles, are fully investigated. Under large inclination angle (90 degrees), the smooth heat pipe without any extra wick performs lower temperature difference, lower thermal resistance, and higher heat transport capacity compared to that with aluminum fiber wick whereas the heat pipes with wicks present superiority under smaller inclination angles (60 degrees and 30 degrees) due to the liquid backfiow enhancement. Besides, comparative study also shows that wick structure optimization holds the potential to improve the thermal performance of this ultra-thin two-phase device. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据