4.5 Article

Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) at rest and after acute aerobic exercise in major depressive disorder

期刊

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 212-215

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.12.015

关键词

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF); Platelets; Major depressive disorder; Physical exercise

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) [HE7464/2-1, FY1/5-1, STR504/6-1]
  2. Dalla Vecchia Foundation on Depression Research (Dalla Vecchia Stiftung Depressionsforschung)
  3. University of Potsdam
  4. Potsdam Graduate School, University of Potsdam

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Physiological mechanisms of an anti-depressive effect of physical exercise in major depressive disorder (MDD) seem to involve alterations in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) level. However, previous studies which investigated this effect in a single bout of exercise, did not control for confounding peripheral factors that contribute to BDNF-alterations. Therefore, the underlying cause of exercise-induced BDNF-changes remains unclear. The current study aims to investigate serum BDNF (sBDNF)-changes due to a single-bout of graded aerobic exercise in a group of 30 outpatients with MDD, suggesting a more precise analysis method by taking plasma volume shift and number of platelets into account. Results show that exercise-induced increases in sBDNF remain significant (p<.001) when adjusting for plasma volume shift and controlling for number of platelets. The interaction of sBDNF change and number of platelets was also significant (p=.001) indicating larger sBDNF-increase in participants with smaller number of platelets. Thus, findings of this study suggest an involvement of peripheral as well as additional possibly brain-derived mechanisms explaining exercise-related BDNF release in MDD. For future studies in the field of exercise-related BDNF research, the importance of controlling for peripheral parameters is emphasized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据