4.2 Article

Stabilized Human Cystatin C Variant L47C/G69C Is a Better Reporter Than the Wild-Type Inhibitor for Characterizing the Thermodynamics of Binding to Cysteine Proteases

期刊

PROTEIN JOURNAL
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 598-607

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10930-019-09839-2

关键词

Stabilizing disulfide; Molecular dynamics simulations; Dynamic light scattering; Differential scanning calorimetry; Dimerization

资金

  1. National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT, Mexico) [181049, 237256, 283296]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human cystatin C (HCC) binds and inhibits all types of cysteine proteases from the papain family, including cathepsins (a group of enzymes that participate in a variety of physiological processes), which are some of its natural targets. The affinities of diverse proteases for HCC, expressed as equilibrium binding constants (K-b), range from 10(6) to 10(14) M-1. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) is one of the most useful techniques to characterize the thermodynamics of molecular associations, making it possible to dissect the binding free energy into its enthalpic and entropic components. This information, together with the structural changes that occur during the different associations, could enable better understanding of the molecular basis of affinity. Notwithstanding the high sensitivity of modern calorimeters, ITC requires protein concentrations in at least the 10-100 mu M range to obtain reliable data, and it is known that HCC forms oligomers in this concentration range. We present herein a comparative study of the structural, thermal stability, and oligomerization properties of HCC and its stabilized variant (sHCC) L47C/G69C (which possesses an additional disulfide bridge) as well as their binding thermodynamics to the protease chymopapain, analyzed by ITC. The results show that, because sHCC remains monomeric, it is a better reporter than wild-type HCC to characterize the thermodynamics of binding to cysteine proteases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据