4.8 Review

Recent developments in the conservation of materials properties of historical wood

期刊

PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 167-221

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.12.001

关键词

Biobased polymers; Archaeological wood; Cultural heritage; Nanocomposites; Adaptable materials

资金

  1. EU 7th Framework project Synpol [311815]
  2. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under REA through the PRESTIGE programme [PCOFUND-GA-2013-609102, PRESTIGE-2016-2-0008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wood is a complex hierarchical material. As a widely available renewable resource, it has been used throughout history to construct dwellings and transportation, tools, art and funerary objects. The desire to better understand cultural heritage and preserve it for future generations has long been a major driver in the study of wooden objects in the social sciences. This trend can also be associated with a recent strong push to create, low-cost, environmentally-responsible, sustainable housing solutions for rapidly expanding urban populations. Thus, interest in studying wood degradation and conservation from an engineering/materials science perspective has increased significantly. The study of degradation phenomena in wooden artefacts, along with methods to conserve or enhance their material properties and monitor changes over time is, not only, invaluable to archaeological science, but also to engineers and materials scientists concerned with the endurance of the wooden constructions of tomorrow. The aim of this review is to highlight recent developments in the characterisation, consolidation and monitoring of materials properties of archaeological wood. A specific focus will be placed on bio-sourced consolidants and multi-phase systems based on nano-fillers, recognising the contribution to archaeological science and underlining the impact this knowledge can play on future developments in wooden construction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据