4.8 Article

Rational design of an argon-binding superelectrophilic anion

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820812116

关键词

superelectrophilic anions; multiple-charged anions; Ar compounds; photoelectron spectroscopy; dodecaborates

资金

  1. Fritz-Haber-Institute of the Max-Planck-Society
  2. German Research Foundation for an Emmy Noether Fellowship [GR 4451/1-1]
  3. Center for Scalable Predictive Methods for Excitations and Correlated Phenomena (SPEC) - US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Computational Chemical Sciences Progr
  4. US DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences at PNNL
  5. Office of Science of the US DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  7. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemically binding to argon (Ar) at room temperature has remained the privilege of the most reactive electrophiles, all of which are cationic (or even dicationic) in nature. Herein, we report a concept for the rational design of anionic superelectrophiles that are composed of a strong electrophilic center firmly embedded in a negatively charged framework of exceptional stability. To validate our concept, we synthesized the percyano-dodecoborate [B-12(CN)(12)](2-) the electronically most stable dianion ever investigated experimentally. It serves as a precursor for the generation of the monoanion [B-12(CN)(11)](-), which indeed spontaneously binds Ar at 298 K. Our mass spectrometric and spectroscopic studies are accompanied by high-level computational investigations including a bonding analysis of the exceptional B-Ar bond. The detection and characterization of this highly reactive, structurally stable anionic superelectrophile starts another chapter in the metal-free activation of particularly inert compounds and elements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据