4.8 Article

Coherent directed movement toward food modeled in Trichoplax, a ciliated animal lacking a nervous system

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1815655116

关键词

Placozoa; eukaryotic chemotaxis; coherent motion; multicellularity; Wdirected migration

资金

  1. Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico, Programa de Apoyos para la Superacion del Personal Academico de la Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  2. Conacyt [283279]
  3. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [ZIANS002972] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trichoplax adhaerens is a small, ciliated marine animal that glides on surfaces grazing upon algae, which it digests externally. It has no muscles or nervous system and only six cell types, all but two of which are embedded in its epithelium. The epithelial cells are joined by apical adherens junctions; neither tight junctions nor gap junctions are present. Monociliated epithelial cells on the lower surface propel gliding. The cilia beat regularly, but asynchronously, and transiently contact the substrate with each stroke. The animal moves in random directions in the absence of food. We show here that it exhibits chemotaxis, moving preferentially toward algae embedded in a disk of agar. We present a mathematical model to explain how coherent, directional movements could arise from the collective actions of a set of ciliated epithelial cells, each independently sensing and responding to a chemoattractant gradient. The model incorporates realistic values for viscoelastic properties of cells and produces coordinated movements and changes in body shape that resemble the actual movements of the animal. The model demonstrates that an animal can move coherently in search of food without any need for chemical signaling between cells and introduces a different approach to modeling behavior in primitive multicellular organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据