4.8 Article

Multiphase reactivity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons is driven by phase separation and diffusion limitations

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1902517116

关键词

phase state; ozone; indoor chemistry; bulk diffusion; kinetic modeling

资金

  1. NSF [CAREER: AGS-1654104]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation [G-2017-9796, 2016-7049]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN/05972-2017, RGPIN/04315-2014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), a key polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) often associated with soot particles coated by organic compounds, is a known carcinogen and mutagen. When mixed with organics, the kinetics and mechanisms of chemical transformations of BaP by ozone in indoor and outdoor environments are still not fully elucidated. Using direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS), kinetics studies of the ozonolysis of BaP in thin films exhibited fast initial loss of BaP followed by a slower decay at long exposure times. Kinetic multilayer modeling demonstrates that the slow decay of BaP over long times can be simulated if there is slow diffusion of BaP from the film interior to the surface, resolving longstanding unresolved observations of incomplete PAH decay upon prolonged ozone exposure. Phase separation drives the slow diffusion time scales in multicomponent systems. Specifically, thermodynamic modeling predicts that BaP phase separates from secondary organic aerosol material so that the BaP-rich layer at the surface shields the inner BaP from ozone. Also, BaP is miscible with organic oils such as squalane, linoleic acid, and cooking oil, but its oxidation products are virtually immiscible, resulting in the formation of a viscous surface crust that hinders diffusion of BaP from the film interior to the surface. These findings imply that phase separation and slow diffusion significantly prolong the chemical lifetime of PAH5, affecting long-range transport of PAH5 in the atmosphere and their fates in indoor environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据