4.8 Article

Genetic variation across the human olfactory receptor repertoire alters odor perception

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1804106115

关键词

olfaction; genetic variation; human genome; odor intensity; ancestry

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R03 DC011373, R01 DC013339, T32 DC000014, F32 DC014202, DC005782, DC012095, DC014423]
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation [2017/00726-2]
  3. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Core Grant [P30 DC011735]
  4. Clinical and Translational Science Award from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1 TR000043]
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [17/00726-2] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humans use a family of more than 400 olfactory receptors (ORs) to detect odors, but there is currently no model that can predict olfactory perception from receptor activity patterns. Genetic variation in human ORs is abundant and alters receptor function, allowing us to examine the relationship between receptor function and perception. We sequenced the OR repertoire in 332 individuals and examined how genetic variation affected 276 olfactory phenotypes, including the perceived intensity and pleasantness of 68 odorants at two concentrations, detection thresholds of three odorants, and general olfactory acuity. Genetic variation in a single OR was frequently associated with changes in odorant perception, and we validated 10 cases in which in vitro OR function correlated with in vivo odorant perception using a functional assay. In 8 of these 10 cases, reduced receptor function was associated with reduced intensity perception. In addition, we used participant genotypes to quantify genetic ancestry and found that, in combination with single OR genotype, age, and gender, we can explain between 10% and 20% of the perceptual variation in 15 olfactory phenotypes, highlighting the importance of single OR genotype, ancestry, and demographic factors in the variation of olfactory perception.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据