4.7 Article

Selenium protects wheat seedlings against salt stress-mediated oxidative damage by up-regulating antioxidants and osmolytes metabolism

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 144-153

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.02.004

关键词

Selenium; Wheat; Salt mesa; Oxidative damage; Antioxidants; Osmolytes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salinity stress hampers the growth of most crop plants and reduces yield considerably. Therefore, experiments were conducted on wheat (Trideum aestivurn L.) plants for studying the role of selenium (5 and 10 mu M Se) supplementation in strengthening the salinity stress tolerance. Exposure to salinity (100 mM NaCl) reduced growth in terms of length, fresh and dry biomass yield. Se was affective in ameliorating the deleterious effects of Nag stress to significant levels when supplied at 5 mu M concentrations compared to 10 mu M. Application of Se at 5 mu M concentration did not show significant impacts on the physiological and biochemical parameters studied. Plants supplemented with 5 mu M Se exhibited the highest RWC, chlorophyll synthesis, and photosynthesis. Se supplementation reduced the NaCl-mediated oxidative damage by up-regulating the activity of enzymatic components of the antioxidant system and the accumulation of ascorbate and glutathione. Furthermore, 5 mu M Se proved beneficial in enhancing proline and sugar accumulation in normal and NaCl-stressed seedlings providing extra osmolarity to maintain RWC and protect photosynthesis. Se also affected proline metabolism by modulating the activities of the gamma-glutamyl kinase (gamma-GK) and proline oxidase (PROX) leading to its greater synthesis and lesser degradation. Moreover, it was observed that Se declined the Na/K ratio and also improved nitrogen and Ca uptake. Conclusively, Se at low concentration can be beneficial in preventing salinity-mediated damage and further studies are required to unravel underlying mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据