4.8 Article

Multiple downy mildew effectors target the stress-related NAC transcription factor LsNAC069 in lettuce

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 99, 期 6, 页码 1098-1115

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14383

关键词

NAC transcription factors; oomycetes; drought stress; transcription factor relocalization; Lactuca sativa; Bremia lactucae; Pseudomonas cichorii

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To cause disease in lettuce, the biotrophic oomycete Bremia lactucae secretes potential RxLR effector proteins. Here we report the discovery of an effector-target hub consisting of four B. lactucae effectors and one lettuce protein target by a yeast-two-hybrid (Y2H) screening. Interaction of the lettuce tail-anchored NAC transcription factor, LsNAC069, with B. lactucae effectors does not require the N-terminal NAC domain but depends on the C-terminal region including the transmembrane domain. Furthermore, in Y2H experiments, B. lactucae effectors interact with Arabidopsis and potato tail-anchored NACs, suggesting that they are conserved effector targets. Transient expression of RxLR effector proteins BLR05 and BLR09 and their target LsNAC069 in planta revealed a predominant localization to the endoplasmic reticulum. Phytophthora capsici culture filtrate and polyethylene glycol treatment induced relocalization to the nucleus of a stabilized LsNAC069 protein, lacking the NAC-domain (LsNAC069(Delta)(NAC)). Relocalization was significantly reduced in the presence of the Ser/Cys-protease inhibitor TPCK indicating proteolytic cleavage of LsNAC069 allows for relocalization. Co-expression of effectors with LsNAC069(Delta)(NAC) reduced its nuclear accumulation. Surprisingly, LsNAC069 silenced lettuce lines had decreased LsNAC069 transcript levels but did not show significantly altered susceptibility to B. lactucae. In contrast, LsNAC069 silencing increased resistance to Pseudomonas cichorii bacteria and reduced wilting effects under moderate drought stress, indicating a broad role of LsNAC069 in abiotic and biotic stress responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据