4.7 Article

Interactions between hydrogen sulphide and nitric oxide regulate two soybean citrate transporters during the alleviation of aluminium toxicity

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 42, 期 8, 页码 2340-2356

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13555

关键词

aluminium resistance; citrate exudation; GmMATE; hydrogen sulphide; nitric oxide; plasma membrane H+-ATPase; soybean

资金

  1. Science Foundation of the Henan Normal University for Outstanding Young Scholars [14YQ003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31301252, U1704101, U1704121]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) is emerging as an important signalling molecule involved in plant resistance to various stresses. However, the underlying mechanism of H2S in aluminium (Al) resistance and the crosstalk between H2S and nitric oxide (NO) in Al stress signalling remain elusive. Citrate secretion is a wide-spread strategy for plants against Al toxicity. Here, two citrate transporter genes, GmMATE13 and GmMATE47, were identified and characterized in soybean. Functional analysis in Xenopus oocytes and transgenic Arabidopsis showed that GmMATE13 and GmMATE47 mediated citrate exudation and enhanced Al resistance. Al treatment triggered H2S generation and citrate exudation in soybean roots. Pretreatment with an H2S donor significantly elevated Al-induced citrate exudation, reduced Al accumulation in root tips, and alleviated Al-induced inhibition of root elongation, whereas application of an H2S scavenger elicited the opposite effect. Furthermore, H2S and NO mediated Al-induced GmMATE expression and plasma membrane (PM) H+-ATPase activity and expression. Further investigation showed that NO induced H2S production by regulating the key enzymes involved in biosynthesis and degradation of H2S. These findings indicate that H2S acts downstream of NO in mediating Al-induced citrate secretion through the upregulation of PM H+-ATPase-coupled citrate transporter cotransport systems, thereby conferring plant resistance to Al toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据