4.8 Article

Paternally Acting Canonical RNA-Directed DNA Methylation Pathway Genes Sensitize Arabidopsis Endosperm to Paternal Genome Dosage

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 31, 期 7, 页码 1563-1578

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.19.00047

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences [1453459]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1453459] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seed development is sensitive to parental dosage, with excess maternal or paternal genomes creating reciprocal phenotypes. Paternal genomic excess frequently results in extensive endosperm proliferation without cellularization and seed abortion. We previously showed that loss of the RNA polymerase IV gene NUCLEAR RNA POLYMERASE D1 (NRPD1) in tetraploid fathers represses seed abortion in paternal excess crosses. Here, we show genetically that RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway activity in the paternal parent is sufficient to determine the viability of paternal excess Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seeds. We compared transcriptomes, DNA methylation, and small RNAs from the endosperm of seeds from balanced crosses (diploid x diploid) and lethal (diploid x tetraploid) and viable paternal excess crosses (diploid x tetraploid nrpd1). Endosperms from both lethal and viable paternal excess seeds share widespread transcriptional and DNA methylation changes at genes and transposable elements. Interploidy seed abortion is thus unlikely to be caused by transposable elements or imprinted gene misregulation, and its repression by the loss of paternal RdDM is associated with only modest gene expression changes. Finally, using allele-specific transcription data, we present evidence for a transcriptional buffering system that increases the expression of maternal alleles and represses paternal alleles in response to excess paternal genomic dosage. These findings prompt reconsideration of models for dosage sensitivity in endosperm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据