4.7 Article

Isotope fractionation during root water uptake by Acacia caven is enhanced by arbuscular mycorrhizas

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 441, 期 1-2, 页码 485-497

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-019-04139-1

关键词

Aquaporins; Ecohydrology; Isotope fractionation; Mycorrhiza; Plant-soil-water interactions; Stable isotopes

资金

  1. Commissie Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (CWO), Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, UGent
  2. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnologia (SECyT) - Universidad Nacional de Cordoba

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim A growing number of studies show a discrepancy between the isotopic composition of xylem water and plant water sources. We tested the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on the isotopic composition of Acacia caven xylem water. As the most common plant-fungal association, AMF might explain this isotopic mismatch. Methods Seedlings were grown with and without AMF and irrigated with the same water. After 120 days, stem and soil samples were collected and following cryogenic distillation, H and O isotopic composition of xylem and soil water, as well as irrigation water, was measured. Results Xylem water of non-mycorrhizal seedlings was significantly depleted in H-2 compared to soil water (differences up to -15.6 parts per thousand). When AMF were present, the depletion was significantly higher and appeared for both H and O (differences up to -24.6 parts per thousand for delta H-2 and - 2.9 parts per thousand for delta O-18 between soil and xylem water). Conclusions Results suggest that isotopic fractionation occurred during water uptake in this xerophytic species. To explain this, we propose an aquaporin-driven mechanism mediating water transport via transmembrane passage. Furthermore, we show for the first time, that AMF enhance the observed discrimination against heavy isotopes, probably by enforcing water passage through aquaporins. Given their ubiquity, AMF could question the fractionation-free assumption during root water uptake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据