4.7 Article

Effect of localised phosphorus application on root growth and soil nutrient dynamics in situ - comparison of maize (Zea mays) and faba bean (Vicia faba) at the seedling stage

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 441, 期 1-2, 页码 469-483

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-019-04138-2

关键词

Zea mays (maize) center dot Vicia faba (faba bean) center dot phosphorus placement center dot in situ center dot X-ray CT center dot soil solution center dot root growth center dot 4 dimensions (4D)

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0200202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772402, 31330070]
  3. Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims Root morphological response to localised phosphorus (P) application plays a crucial role in P acquisition. However, detailed knowledge of when and where roots respond to P patch (localised P supply) in situ is still lacking. Methods X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) was used to quantify the root response to localised and uniform triple superphosphate supply in maize (Zea mays) and faba bean (Vicia faba). Soil solution was extracted by micro suction cups. Results On the spatial scale, X-ray CT results showed that maize roots proliferated in the P patch, resulting in higher root length density compared to the uniform P supply. On the temporal scale, the proliferation of maize roots into the patch occurred as early as 11 days after sowing. Faba bean showed no response to the P patch during the experimental period. In soil solution, localised P fertiliser supply not only increased the concentration of P and calcium, elements present in the fertiliser, but also potassium and magnesium. Conclusions Our results indicate a fine-scale time pattern for P concentration in the local site to enhance root proliferation of maize but not faba bean, which suggests an evident difference in root response to local P supply between maize and faba bean at the seedling stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据