4.5 Article

Relationship between resilience and stress: Perceived stress, stressful life events, HPA axis response during a stressful task and hair cortisol

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 202, 期 -, 页码 87-93

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.02.001

关键词

Resilience; Hair cortisol; Salivary cortisol; Perceived stress; Laboratory stressor; Life events

资金

  1. I + D Project [PSI2010-15780]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background There is no consensus about how resilience is related to the different types of stress such as daily or chronic stress and psychopathology. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between resilience and the different measures of stress such as perceived stress, chronic stress, life events, HPA axis response during a stressful task and psychopathology. Material and methods: The design was cross-sectional. Resilience, perceived stress, stressful life events, hair cortisol and HPA axis response during Trier Social Stress Test measured by salivary cortisol samples and psychopathological symptoms were assessed in a sample of 80 University students. Results: Participants with low resilience showed higher scores in perceived stress level (p <.001), the number of current life events (p <.02), the intensity of stressful events (p <.025) as well as Obsession and Compulsion (p =.006), Interpersonal Sensitivity (p =.028), Phobic Anxiety (p =.044) and psychopathological severity (p =.033). Resilience was associated with chronic stress by perceived stress (p <.001), hair cortisol concentration (p =.022), obsessions and compulsions (p =.016), interpersonal sensitivity (p =.022), and depression symptoms (p =.039). Conclusion: Resilience seems to be determinant in perceived stress, the number of current life events, the intensity of stressful events, chronic stress, obsession and compulsions, interpersonal sensitivity, phobic anxiety and depression symptoms, and psychopathological severity index.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据