4.1 Article

Diversity and distribution of Laurencia sensu stricto (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) from the Mexican Pacific, including L. mutueae sp. nov.

期刊

PHYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 67, 期 4, 页码 267-278

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pre.12382

关键词

COI-5P; floristic affinities; Parsimony Areas of Endemism analysis; phylogeny; rbcL; species richness; taxonomy

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2018/06085-1]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [302549/2017-0]
  3. [UAMI-CBS2019-2022: 17.18-281 118]
  4. [UAMI-CA-117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The alpha diversity of Laurencia sensu stricto, as well as the majority of the other algal groups along the Mexican Pacific, was underestimated because very few studies had incorporated the use of molecular markers in taxonomic studies, which would allow a more realistic estimation of diversity, incluing new records and new species. The records of Laurencia s.s. for the Eastern Pacific (California, USA to Chile) currently represent 23% of its richness worldwide. In this work, we proposed an updated census of the currently recognized species of Laurencia s.s. for the Mexican Pacific. This checklist reported the occurrence of 22 species that represent 16% of the 137 species worldly recorded. We further included taxonomic remarks, type localities, and a detailed distribution for each species. In addition, we proposed a new species for this region, Laurencia mutueae sp. nov., based on morphological observation as well as phylogenetic analyses. The distribution in the Mexican Pacific revealed that the highest records of species were for the sub-temperate region, while the localities along the Mexican tropical Pacific were poorly recorded. The scarcity of floristic affinities between the eastern and the western and central parts of the North Pacific Ocean was hypothesized to be a consequence of a strong isolation and hard barriers, such as the water masses between these regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据