4.7 Article

Antimicrobial Peptide Mimicking Primary Amine and Guanidine Containing Methacrylamide Copolymers Prepared by Raft Polymerization

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 3845-3852

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01162

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Dept. of Education GAANN Fellowship Program [P200A090066]
  2. National Science Foundation [OISE-1132079]
  3. Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) [I1A14303646]
  4. Office Of The Director
  5. Office of Integrative Activities [1430280] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Office Of The Director
  7. Office of Integrative Activities [1430364] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) display the ability to eliminate a wide variety of bacteria, without toxicity to the host eukaryotic cells. Synthetic polymers containing moieties mimicking lysine and arginine components found in AMPs have been reported to show effectiveness against specific bacteria, with the mechanism of activity purported to depend on the nature of the amino acid mimic. In an attempt to incorporate the antimicrobial activity of both amino acids into a single water-soluble copolymer, a series of copolymers containing lysine mimicking aminopropyl methacrylamide (APMA) and arginine mimicking guanadinopropyl methacrylamide (GPMA) were prepared via aqueous RAFT polymerization. Copolymers were prepared with varying ratios of the comonomers, with degree of polymerization of 35-40 and narrow molecular weight distribution to simulate naturally occurring AMPs. Antimicrobial activity was determined against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria under conditions with varying salt concentration. Toxicity to mammalian cells was assessed by hemolysis of red blood cells and MTT assays of MCF-7 cells. Antimicrobial activity was observed for APMA homopolymer and copolymers with low concentrations of GPMA against all bacteria tested, with low toxicity toward mammalian cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据