4.4 Review

Plasticity leading to cerebellum-dependent learning: two different regions, two different types

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-019-02282-3

关键词

Cerebellum; Purkinje cells; Vestibular nucleus; Intrinsic plasticity; Vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR); Memory

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIP) [2018R1A5A2025964, 2017M3C7A1029611, 2016R1D1A1A02937282, 2013H1A2A1034318]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1D1A1A02937282, 2017M3C7A1029611, 2013H1A2A1034318, 2018R1A5A2025964] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In memory research, studying cerebellum-dependent memory is advantageous due to its relatively simple neural architecture compared with that of other memory circuits. To understand how cerebellum-dependent memory develops and is stored in this circuit, numerous hypotheses have been proposed. These hypotheses are generally able to adequately explain most learning and memory processes; however, several reported results are still poorly understood. Recently, the importance of intrinsic plasticity (i.e., plasticity of intrinsic excitability) has been highlighted in several studies. Because the classical view of cerebellum-dependent eye movement learning was focused on synaptic plasticity, it is valuable to consider the intrinsic plasticity for deeper understanding. In the present review, we re-examine the utility and limitations of previous hypotheses, from classic to recent, and propose an updated hypothesis. Integrating intrinsic plasticity into current models of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) circuit may facilitate deeper understanding of the VOR adaptation process. In particular, during the period of memory transfer, dynamic changes in excitability in both cerebellar Purkinje cells and vestibular nuclear neurons illuminate the role of intrinsic plasticity in the circuit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据