4.3 Article

Serum Vitamin D Levels in Patients with Keratoconus

期刊

OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 348-353

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1604002

关键词

Keratoconus; Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D; vitamin D deficiency

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in patients with keratoconus (KC) and its association with disease severity and to compare vitamin D levels with those of age- and sex-matched healthy individuals. Methods: This study included 100 patients with KC and 100 non-atopic healthy controls. Serum vitamin D levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and compared between the study groups. KC severity was graded as mild (K = 43.1-46.9 D), moderate (K = 47-50 D), and severe (K > 50 D). Vitamin D levels were classified as deficient (<= 10 ng/mL), insufficient (11-20 ng/mL), and optimal (>20 ng/mL). Results: The mean serum vitamin D level was significantly lower in the KC group than in the control group (12.18 +/- 5.05 ng/mL vs 15.18 +/- 5.81 ng/mL; p < .001). Vitamin D deficiency (<= 10 ng/mL) was observed in 54.0% of the KC patients and 34.0% of the controls (p = .011). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that having deficient vitamin D level increased the presence of KC 2.9 fold (p = .021, 95% confidence interval, 1.17-6.95). Decreasing serum vitamin D levels were not significantly associated with increasing severity of KC (p = .311). Although the rate of patients with deficient vitamin D was the highest in the severe KC group, distribution of vitamin D levels were not significantly different among KC groups (p = .326). Conclusion: The patients with KC had lower serum vitamin D levels than those of age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The present study could be a valuable entry point for further researches investigating the potential link between vitamin D and KC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据