4.7 Article

Robust time-varying formation control for underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles with disturbances under input saturation

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 180-188

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.017

关键词

Autonomous underwater vehicles; Additional control; Time-varying formation control; Input saturation; Disturbance observer

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51079013]
  2. Technology Foundation for Selected Overseas Chinese Scholar
  3. Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of the People's Republic of China
  4. Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University [LR2015007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a robust control scheme is developed for time-varying formation of multiple underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) with disturbances under input saturation. Firstly, the reference trajectory of the follower is defined using a body-fixed coordinate transformation based on the leader position and predetermined time-varying formation. Next, three new additional control terms are proposed to handle the input saturation and underactuation problems of AUVs, respectively. On the basis of the above, the robust formation control law is designed incorporating a disturbance observer into the dynamic surface control (DSC) method, where the disturbance observer is constructed to online estimate unknown time-varying disturbances. The designed formation control law does not depend on the leader's acceleration due to using DSC and the mass matrix in the dynamic model of AUVs is non-diagonal, which is more realistic. Strict stability analysis indicates that the designed robust formation control law can make AUVs achieve the predefined time-varying formation, while guaranteeing uniform ultimate boundedness of all signals of the AUV formation closed-loop control systems. Simulation results on three AUVs demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed formation control scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据