4.4 Article

Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Weight Loss Failure

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 2436-2441

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-019-03864-x

关键词

Sleeve gastrectomy; Weight loss failure; Revisional surgery; One anastomosis gastric bypass

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) was suggested as an option in the management of weight loss failure after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). In parallel, the length of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) is currently debated. Objectives To evaluate morbidity and efficiency of the conversion of SG to OAGB using two lengths of BPL (150 cm versus 200 cm). Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database on 72 patients operated on between 2007 and 2017: (200-cm BPL before 2014 versus 150-cm BPL since 2014). Results At revision, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 43.6 +/- 7 kg/m(2). Sixteen patients (20%) had type 2 diabetes (T2D) and 23 (29%) had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Early morbidity rate was 4.2% (n = 3). Mean BMI were 33.7 +/- 6 and 34.8 +/- 9 at 2 and 5 years, respectively. At 5 years, the rate of lost of follow-up was 34%. T2D and OSA improved in 80% (n = 12) and 70% (n = 16) of the patients, respectively. At revision, the mean BMI were 46 +/- 8 kg/m(2) and 41 +/- 6 kg/m(2) for patients with 200-cm BPL (n = 38) and 150-cm BPL (n = 34), respectively. Two years after conversion, the mean BMI were 34 +/- 1 kg/m(2) for 200-cm BPL and 32 +/- 7 kg/m(2) for 150-cm BPL. The rate of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and diarrhea was 13% and 5% in patients with 200-cm BPL versus 3% and 0% in patients with 150-cm BPL. Conclusion This study shows that the conversion of SG to OAGB is feasible and safe allowing significant weight loss and improvement in comorbidities. Weight loss seems comparable between the 150-cm and 200-cm BPL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据