4.8 Article

miR-122 and Ago interactions with the HCV genome alter the structure of the viral 5 terminus

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 10, 页码 5307-5324

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz194

关键词

-

资金

  1. McGill University
  2. NSERC Discovery grant program [RGPIN-2014-05907]
  3. US National Institutes of Health [R01-GM104475, R01-GM115649, R35-GM127090]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [Advanced Postdoc Mobility Fellowship] [P300PA_177860]
  5. NYU Abu Dhabi
  6. Canada Research Chairs program
  7. NSERC
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P300PA_177860] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a positive-sense RNA virus that interacts with the liver-specific microRNA, miR-122. miR-122 binds to two sites in the 5 untranslated region (UTR) and this interaction promotes HCV RNA accumulation, although the precise role of miR-122 in the HCV life cycle remains unclear. Using biophysical analyses and Selective 2 Hydroxyl Acylation analyzed by Primer Extension (SHAPE) we investigated miR-122 interactions with the 5 UTR. Our data suggests that miR-122 binding results in alteration of nucleotides 1-117 to suppress an alternative secondary structure and promote functional internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) formation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that two hAgo2:miR-122 complexes are able to bind to the HCV 5 terminus simultaneously and SHAPE analyses revealed further alterations to the structure of the 5 UTR to accommodate these complexes. Finally, we present a computational model of the hAgo2:miR-122:HCV RNA complex at the 5 terminus of the viral genome as well as hAgo2:miR-122 interactions with the IRES-40S complex that suggest hAgo2 is likely to form additional interactions with SLII which may further stabilize the HCV IRES. Taken together, our results support a model whereby hAgo2:miR-122 complexes alter the structure of the viral 5 terminus and promote formation of the HCV IRES.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据