4.7 Article

Self-Assembled Arginine-Capped Peptide Bolaamphiphile Nanosheets for Cell Culture and Controlled Wettability Surfaces

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 3180-3190

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00820

关键词

-

资金

  1. FAPESP [2014/03514-8, 2013/12997-0, 400239/2014-0]
  2. CNPq
  3. Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award
  4. EPSRC Platform Grant Nanostructured Polymeric Materials for Healthcare [EP/L020599/1]
  5. ESRF [proposal MX1666]
  6. Diamond Light Source [proposal SM10083-1]
  7. BBSRC [BB/I008187/1, BB/I008187/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. EPSRC [EP/L020599/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I008187/2, BB/I008187/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L020599/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spontaneous assembly of a peptide bolaamphiphile in water, namely, RFL4FR (R, arginine; F, phenylalanine; L, leucine) is investigated, along with its novel properties in surface modification and usage as substrates for cell culture. RFL4FR self-assembles into nanosheets through lateral association of the peptide backbone. The 1,4 sequence is located within the core of the nanosheets, whereas the R moieties are exposed to the water at the surface of the nanosheets. Kinetic assays indicate that the self-assembly is driven by a remarkable two-step process, where a nucleation phase is followed by fast growth of nanosheets with an autocatalysis process. The internal structure of the nanosheets is formed from ultrathin bolaamphiphile monolayers with a crystalline orthorhombic symmetry with cross-beta organization. We show that human corneal stromal fibroblast (hCSF) cells can grow on polystyrene films coated with films dried from RFL4FR solutions. For the first time, this type of amphiphilic peptide is used as a substrate to modulate the wettability of solid surfaces for cell culture applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据