4.4 Article

Commissioning of the BRIKEN detector for the measurement of very exotic β-delayed neutron emitters

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2019.02.004

关键词

Beta-delayed neutrons; Neutron and beta counters; Analysis methodology; Background correction

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [FPA2011-24553, FPA2011-28770-C03-03, FPA2014-52823-C2-1/2, IJCI-2014-19172, SEV-2014-0398]
  2. Office of Nuclear Physics, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-FG02-96ER40983]
  3. National Nuclear Security Administration, United States under the Stewardship Science Academic Alliances program through DOE [DE-NA0002132]
  4. JSPS, Japan KAKENHI [14F04808, 17H06090, 25247045, 19340074]
  5. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) via the Discovery Grants [SAPIN-2014-00028, RGPAS 462257-2014]
  7. National Science Foundation, United States [PHY 1714153, PHY-1430152, PHY-1565546]
  8. NKFIH, Hungary [K120666]
  9. South Korea NRF [2016K1A3A7A09005575, 2015H1A2A1030275]
  10. STFC [EP/E004385/1, ST/P004598/1, 2017 STFC Nuclear Physics CG, ST/J000108/1, ST/L005670/1, 1853133, ST/P004008/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [14F04808, 17H06090, 19340074] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new detection system has been installed at the RIKEN Nishina Center (Japan) to investigate decay properties of very neutron-rich nuclei. The setup consists of three main parts: a moderated neutron counter, a detection system sensitive to the implantation and decay of radioactive ions, and gamma-ray detectors. We describe here the setup, the commissioning experiment and some selected results demonstrating its performance for the measurement of half-lives and beta-delayed neutron emission probabilities. The methodology followed in the analysis of the data is described in detail. Particular emphasis is placed on the correction of the accidental neutron background.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据