4.5 Article

Spike and Local Field Synchronization Between the Pedunculopontine Nucleus and Primary Motor Cortex in a Rat Model of Parkinson's Disease

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 404, 期 -, 页码 470-483

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.01.044

关键词

Parkinson's disease; the pedunculopontine nucleus; motor cortex; spike; local field potential; coherence

资金

  1. Key Research and Development program of Shandong [2018CXCC1502]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018BC024]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [31571104]
  4. Science Technological Project of Shandong Province [2016GSF201058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) shows altered electrophysiological and anatomic characteristics in Parkinson's disease (PD), but little is known about the effect of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesion and levodopa ((L)-DOPA) therapy on the relationship between spike and local field potential (LFP) activities in the PPN and motor cortex. Aiming to investigate this, synchronous spike and LFP signals in the PPN and primary motor cortex (M1) were recorded. The spike-LFP relationship was evaluated using coherence analysis, phase-lock and spike-field coherence (SFC). The results suggested that 6-OHDA lesion had a significant effect on the spike-LFP relationship between the PPN and M1 in rats under a rest or locomotion state. The significantly altered frequency bands varied across different neuron types and animal activity states. In addition, the altered coherence values between PPN spike and M1 LFP were refractory to long-term (L)-DOPA therapy although all other changes could be reversed by this drug treatment. All results provided evidence of the spike-LFP relationship between the PPN and M1 in PD, revealing some network mechanisms of the cortico-basal ganglia circuitry and PPN, which might be an underlying candidate for PD pathophysiology and therapy. (C) 2019 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据