4.4 Article

Autonomically mediated anti-inflammatory effects of electrical stimulation at acupoints in a rodent model of colonic inflammation

期刊

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13615

关键词

autonomic function; bioelectronic medicine; electroacupuncture; intestinal inflammation; neuromodulation; ulcerative colitis

资金

  1. Key Laboratory of Pathology and Physiology of Digestive Tract Disease in Zhejiang Province
  2. national Key Disciplines, GI department
  3. natural science foundation of Zhejiang province [LY17H030014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Acupuncture has been widely accepted for treatments of many diseases. This study was performed to determine effects and mechanisms of electroacupuncture (EA) by chronically implanted electrodes at acupoint ST36 on colonic inflammation induced by TNBS in rats. Methods After intrarectal administration of TNBS, the rats were treated with sham-EA, EA1/EA2 (two sets of parameters) for 3 weeks. Disease activity index (DAI), macroscopic and microscopic lesions, plasma levels of TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta and IL-6 were observed as evaluation of inflammatory responses. The autonomic function was assessed by analysis of the heart rate variability. Results (a) Vagal activity was significantly increased with both acute and chronic EA1/EA2; (b) DAI was significantly decreased with both chronic EA1 and EA2, and EA2 was more potent than EA1 (P < 0.05); (c) The macroscopic score was 6.4 +/- 0.6 with sham-EA and reduced to 4.9 +/- 0.1 with EA1 (P < 0.05) and 4.0 +/- 0.2 with EA2 (all P < 0.05). The histological score was 4.05 +/- 0.58 with sham-EA and remained unchanged (3.71 +/- 0.28) with EA1 (P > 0.05) but reduced to 3.0 +/- 0.3 with EA2 (P < 0.01); (d) The plasma levels of TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta and IL-6 were significantly decreased with EA2. Conclusions Electrical stimulation at ST36 improves colonic inflammation in TNBS-treated rats by inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines via the autonomic mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据