4.7 Article

Redox-Sensitive PEG-Polypeptide Nanoporous Particles for Survivin Silencing in Prostate Cancer Cells

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 2168-2178

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00562

关键词

-

资金

  1. Marie Curie Actions-International Research Staff Exchange Scheme [247542]
  2. Fondazione Italo Monzino
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC) under the Australian Laureate Fellowship [FL120100030]
  4. Super Science Fellowship [FS110200025]
  5. ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology [CE140100036]
  6. Future Fellowship [FT140100873]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the engineering of intracellular redox-responsive nanoporous poly(ethylene glycol) poly(L-lysine) particles (NPEG-PLLs). The obtained particles exhibit no toxicity while maintaining the capability to deliver a small interfering RNA sequence (siRNA) targeting the anti-apoptotic factor, survivin, in prostate cancer cells. The redox-mediated cleavage of the disulfide bonds stabilizing the NPEG-PLL-siRNA complex results in the release of bioactive siRNA into the cytosol of prostate cancer PC-3 cells, which, in turn, leads to the effective silencing (similar to 59 +/- 8%) of the target gene. These findings, obtained under optimal conditions, indicate that NPEG-PLLs may protect the therapeutic nucleic acid in the extracellular and intracellular environments, thus preventing the occurrence of competitive interactions with serum and cytosolic proteins as well as degradation by RNase. The intracellular trafficking and final fate of the NPEG-PLLs were investigated by a combination of deconvolution microscopy, fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy, and super-resolution structured illumination microscopy. A significant impairment of cell survival was observed in cells concomitantly exposed to paclitaxel and siRNA-loaded NPEG-PLLs. Overall, our findings indicate that NPEG-PLLs represent a highly loaded depot for the delivery of therapeutic nucleic acids to cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据