4.8 Article

Ultrathin, flexible, solid polymer composite electrolyte enabled with aligned nanoporous host for lithium batteries

期刊

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 705-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-019-0465-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the US Department of Energy under the Battery Materials Research (BMR) programme
  2. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the US Department of Energy under Battery 500 Consortium programme
  3. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) [DE-EE0007803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The urgent need for safer batteries is leading research to all-solid-state lithium-based cells. To achieve energy density comparable to liquid electrolyte-based cells, ultrathin and lightweight solid electrolytes with high ionic conductivity are desired. However, solid electrolytes with comparable thicknesses to commercial polymer electrolyte separators (similar to 10 mu m) used in liquid electrolytes remain challenging to make because of the increased risk of short-circuiting the battery. Here, we report on a polymer-polymer solid-state electrolyte design, demonstrated with an 8.6-mu m-thick nanoporous polyimide (PI) film filled with polyethylene oxide/lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (PEO/LiTFSI) that can be used as a safe solid polymer electrolyte. The PI film is nonflammable and mechanically strong, preventing batteries from short-circuiting even after more than 1,000 h of cycling, and the vertical channels enhance the ionic conductivity (2.3 x 10(-4) S cm(-1) at 30 degrees C) of the infused polymer electrolyte. All-solid-state lithium-ion batteries fabricated with PI/PEO/LiTFSI solid electrolyte show good cycling performance (200 cycles at C/2 rate) at 60 degrees C and withstand abuse tests such as bending, cutting and nail penetration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据