4.6 Article

Alloy design for mechanical properties: Conquering the length scales

期刊

MRS BULLETIN
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 257-265

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1557/mrs.2019.67

关键词

defects; dislocations; structural; simulation; microstructure

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research under Contract ONR BRC [N00014-18-1-2392]
  2. Elings Prize Fellowship in Science by the California NanoSystems Institute of the University of California, Santa Barbara
  3. European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [669141]
  4. National Science Foundation CAREER Award [CMMI-1454072]
  5. Office of Naval Research [N00014-18-1-2858]
  6. Project M5
  7. Priority Program 1713 (Chemo-mechanics)
  8. German Science Foundation
  9. EPSRC [EP/R001715/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predicting the structural response of advanced multiphase alloys and understanding the underlying microscopic mechanisms that are responsible for it are two critically important roles that modeling plays in alloy development. The demonstration of superior properties of an alloy, such as high strength, creep resistance, high ductility, and fracture toughness, is not sufficient to secure its use in widespread applications. Still, a good model is needed to take measurable alloy properties, such as microstructure and chemical composition, and forecast how the alloy will perform in specified mechanical deformation conditions, including temperature, time, and rate. Here, we highlight recent achievements using multiscale modeling in elucidating the coupled effects of alloying, microstructure, and mechanism dynamics on the mechanical properties of polycrystalline alloys. Much of the understanding gained by these efforts relies on the integration of computational tools that vary over many length scales and time scales, from first- principles density functional theory, atomistic simulation methods, dislocation and defect theory, micromechanics, phase- field modeling, single crystal plasticity, and polycrystalline plasticity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据