4.7 Article

Modelling the observable behaviour of SXP 5.05

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1037

关键词

hydrodynamics; stars: emission-line, Be; stars: neutron; X-rays: binaries

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L015382/1]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M000931/1]
  3. Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation
  4. University of Portsmouth
  5. South East Physics Network
  6. STFC [ST/M000931/1, ST/R00045X/1, ST/R002916/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SXP 5.05 is a BeX-ray binary with a neutron star companion located in the Small Magellanic Cloud. It was first detected in 2013, and later that year, SXP 5.05 underwent a massive optical and X-ray outburst. This outburst dwarfs any other optical event that has been observed for this system during the last 5 yr. The large increase in optical brightness of the system implies an increase in the size and density of the Be star's circumstellar disc. The X-ray data show two occultations of the neutron star per orbit and are not consistent with a neutron star passing behind the Be star, and hence the disc is responsible for these occultations. In this paper, we model the outburst of Beneutron star binary SXP 5.05 as being due to a large increase in mass ejection by the Be star. The neutron star passes directly through the growing disc, and it is shown that the resulting obscuration can qualitatively explain the observed X-ray behaviour of the system. We find the only way to reproduce the time-scales of the observed optical behaviour of the system is to increase the mass ejection substantially for a short time (< 2 orbits) and to decrease the viscosity during the event. The general behaviour of the observed X-ray and Ha line emission are also reproduced by the model. However, the inferred mass ejection and viscosity needed to produce a sufficiently rapid increase of disc size are both higher than suggested by previous works.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据