4.7 Article

Maize Carbohydrate Partitioning Defective33 Encodes an MCTP Protein and Functions in Sucrose Export from Leaves

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 1278-1293

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.05.001

关键词

carbohydrate accumulation; companion cells; phloem; plasmodesmata; sieve elements; symplastic transport

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation Plant Genome Research Program [IOS-1025976]
  2. University of Missouri Electron Microscopy Core's EM Excellence Award
  3. Vietnam International Education Development Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To sustain plant growth, development, and crop yield, sucrose must be transported from leaves to distant parts of the plant, such as seeds and roots. To identify genes that regulate sucrose accumulation and transport in maize (Zea mays), we isolated carbohydrate partitioning defective33 (cpd33), a recessive mutant that accumulated excess starch and soluble sugars in mature leaves. The cpd33 mutants also exhibited chlorosis in the leaf blades, greatly diminished plant growth, and reduced fertility. Cpd33 encodes a protein containing multiple C2 domains and transmembrane regions. Subcellular localization experiments showed the CPD33 protein localized to plasmodesmata (PD), the plasma membrane, and the endoplasmic reticulum. We also found that a loss-of-function mutant of the CPD33 homolog in Arabidopsis, QUIRKY, had a similar carbohydrate hyperaccumulation phenotype. Radioactively labeled sucrose transport assays showed that sucrose export was significantly lower in cpd33 mutant leaves relative to wild-type leaves. However, PD transport in the adaxial-abaxial direction was unaffected in cpd33 mutant leaves. Intriguingly, transmission electron microscopy revealed fewer PD at the companion cell-sieve element interface in mutant phloem tissue, providing a possible explanation for the reduced sucrose export in mutant leaves. Collectively, our results suggest that CPD33 functions to promote symplastic transport into sieve elements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据