4.6 Article

The multiple roles of the unfolded protein response regulator IRE1α in cancer

期刊

MOLECULAR CARCINOGENESIS
卷 58, 期 9, 页码 1623-1630

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mc.23031

关键词

endoplasmic reticulum stress; inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha; regulated IRE1 alpha-dependent decay; unfolded protein response; X-Box Binding Protein 1

资金

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Hatch Appropriations [4607, 1009993]
  2. [R01 CA197942]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer is associated with a number of conditions such as hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, cellular redox, and pH changes that result in accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and trigger a stress response known as the unfolded protein response (UPR). The UPR is a conserved cellular survival mechanism mediated by the ER transmembrane proteins activating transcription factor 6, protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase, and inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha (IRE1 alpha) that act to resolve ER stress and promote cell survival. IRE1 alpha is a kinase/endoribonuclease (RNase) with multiple activities including unconventional splicing of the messenger RNA (mRNA) for the transcription factor X-Box Binding Protein 1 (XBP1), degradation of other mRNAs in a process called regulated IRE1 alpha-dependent decay (RIDD) and activation of a pathway leading to c-Jun N-terminal kinase phosphorylation. Each of these outputs plays a role in the adaptive and cell death responses to ER stress. Many studies indicate an important role for XBP1 and RIDD functions in cancer and new studies suggest that these two functions of the IRE1 alpha RNase can have opposing functions in the early and later stages of cancer pathogenesis. Finally, as more is learned about the context-dependent role of IRE1 alpha in cancer development, specific small molecule inhibitors and activators of IRE1 alpha could play an important role in counteracting the protective shield provided by ER stress signaling in cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据