4.5 Article

Reprogramming of Isocitrate Dehydrogenases Expression and Activity by the Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 1699-1709

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-19-0020

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) [PJT159530]
  2. Fondation du CHU de Quebec [3061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations of the isocitrate dehydrogenase genes IDH1 and IDH2, key enzymes involved in citrate metabolism, are important oncogenic events in several cancer types, including in1%-3% of all prostate cancer cases. However, if IDH1 and other IDH isoforms are associated with prostate cancer progression, as well as the regulatory factors controlling their expression and activity, remain mostly unknown. Using publicly available datasets, we showed that prostate cancer harbors the highest IDH1 expression across the human cancer spectrum and that IDH1 expression is altered during prostate cancer progression. Weshowed that the androgen receptor (AR), a key oncogene in prostate cancer, controls multiple IDH isoforms in both in vitro and in vivo models, predominantly positively regulating IDH1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the recruitment of AR at several regulatory regions of IDH1 and enzymatic assays demonstrated that AR significantly induces IDH activity. Genetic blockade of IDH1 significantly impaired prostate cancer cell proliferation, consistent with IDH1 having a key function in these cancer cells. Importantly, knockdown of IDH1 blocked the AR-mediated induction in IDH activity, indicating that AR promotes a mitochondrial to cytoplasmic reprogramming of IDH activity. Overall, our study demonstrates that IDH1 expression is associated with prostate cancer progression, that AR signaling integrates one of the first transcriptional mechanisms shown to regulate IDH1, and that AR reprograms prostate cancer cell metabolism by selectively inducing extra-mitochondrial IDH activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据