4.7 Article

Ultrahigh benzene adsorption capacity of graphene-MOF composite fabricated via MOF crystallization in 3D mesoporous graphene

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 279, 期 -, 页码 387-394

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.01.022

关键词

Mesoporous graphene-MOF composites; Aluminum-based MOF; Benzene adsorption

资金

  1. National Science Centre (Poland) [UMO-2016/23/B/ST5/00532]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Highly porous composites were synthesized via facile crystallization of a metal-organic framework (MOF) in mesopores of a three-dimensional (3D) graphene (MG). First, MG was prepared via facile thermal exfoliation of graphite oxide in air, which enabled sufficient separation of graphene sheets in the form of an interconnected 3D structure. Next, aluminum-based MOF [MOF520: Al-8(OH)(8)(BTB)(4)(HCOO)(4), BTB = 4,4',4 ''-benzene-1,3,5-tryiltribenzoate] was predominantly crystallized in mesopores of 3D structure having a large pore volume. The resulting MG-MOF composites possessed specific surface areas and pore volumes between those of MG (640 m(2)/g and 3.0 cm(3)/g) and MOF (3160 m(2)/g and 1.3 cm(3)/g). The composite consisting of MG and MOF with a weight ratio of 1:2 showed almost twice-larger benzene adsorption capacity, i.e., 24.5 mmol/g at 20 degrees C and relative pressure close to unity, in comparison to that of pure MOF. Although at the same conditions the pure MG captured an ultrahigh amount of benzene, i.e., 33.6 mmol/g, adsorption of this adsorbate at low and moderate relative pressures was much lower than that on pure MOF. Thus, the MG-MOF composites featured much better benzene adsorption performance in a wide range of relative pressures as compared to pure MG and MOF, respectively. Additionally, the composites featured better thermal stability in comparison to the pristine MOF. The use of MG in this synthesis method afforded the well-dispersed, small crystals of MOF, which is essential for the design of MOF-based composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据