4.7 Article

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles capped with graphene quantum dots as multifunctional drug carriers for photo-thermal and redox-responsive release

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 278, 期 -, 页码 130-137

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.11.030

关键词

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles; Graphene quantum dots; Gatekeeper; Redox-responsive; Photo-thermal; Drug delivery system

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of the Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province, PR China [20180101072JC]
  2. Key Program of the Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province, PR China [20180201082SF]
  3. scientific research Program of the Education Department of Jilin Province (P. R. China) [JJKH20180119KJ]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel photo-thermal and redox-responsive drug delivery carrier was developed by capping mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) with graphene quantum dots (GQDs). The disulfide bonds were introduced by amidation reaction between cystine and amino functionalized MSNs. Rhodamine B (RhB), a red fluorescent dye, was loaded into the mesopores of MSNs as the model drug and GQDs capped on MSNs as gatekeepers could prevent the release of RhB. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), nitrogen adsorption and desorption analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric (TG) analysis and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) proved that the nanocomposites MSNs capped with GODs were achieved successfully. The nanocomposites with the size of about 100 nm have excellent photo-thermal property originated from GQDs. Moreover, the nanocomposites were endowed with remarkable redox-responsion to glutathione (GSH) from disulfide bonds, and hence the loaded drugs could release controlably. In this work, we provided an exploration of photo-thermal and redox-responsive drug delivery system and the results proved that this drug delivery system can be considered as a promising candidate for drug delivery and stimuli-responsive release.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据