4.7 Article

Molecularly imprinted monolithic column based on functionalized β-cyclodextrin and multi-walled carbon nanotubes for selective recognition of benzimidazole residues in citrus samples

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 1285-1294

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2019.02.064

关键词

Molecularly imprinted polymers; beta-Cyclodextrin; Multi-walled carbon nanotube; Thiabendazole

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21005021, 21375152, 21675177]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030313740]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Project [2016B030303002]
  4. Key Laboratory of Guangxi Colleges and Universities for Food Safety and Pharmaceutical Analytical Project [FPAC2017ZD-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benzimidazole pesticides are widely used and their amount of residue in fruits and vegetables can indirectly affect the human life. A novel molecularly imprinted monolithic column based on acryloyl-beta-cyclodextrin (A-beta-CD) and silanized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (SMWNTs) was successfully prepared for selective recognition of benzimidazole residues in citrus samples. Using A-beta-CD and methacrylic acid as functional monomers and SMWNTs as modified materials, monolithic column was synthesized by in-situ polymerization. Synthetic conditions of the column were optimized by the response surface methodology. Under optimal conditions, the adsorption behaviors of the column were evaluated by varying flow rate, pH and solvent. The selectivity of the column was tested with structurally similar analogues of benzimidazoles. This column was successfully applied to the simultaneous extraction of thiabendazole, carbendazim and fuberidazole in citrus samples. The column provided a convenient, sensitive, selective and reliable solution for recognizing these benzimidazole residues from citrus samples, and it could be reused at least 20 times without significant loss of absorption efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据