4.7 Article

The Interplay of Disulfide Bonds, α-Helicity, and Hydrophobic Interactions Leads to Ultrahigh Proteolytic Stability of Peptides

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 2347-2355

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00567

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research 973 Program of China [2014CH932004, 200803840007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21305114, 21375110, 21475109]
  3. Thousand-Youth-Talents Plan of China
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [ZK1047]
  5. NFFTBS [J1310024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The contribution of noncovalent interactions to the stability of naturally occurring peptides and proteins has been generally acknowledged, though how these can be rationally manipulated to improve the proteolytic stability of synthetic peptides remains to be explored. In this study, a platform to enhance the proteolytic stability of peptides was developed by controllably dimerizing them into a-helical dimers, connected by two disulfide bonds. This platform not only directs peptides toward an a-helical conformation but permits control of the interfacial hydrophobic interactions between the peptides of the dimer. Using two model dimeric systems constructed from the N-terminal alpha-helix of RNase A and known inhibitors for the E3 ubiquitin ligase MDM2 (and its homologue MDMX), a deeper understanding into the interplay of disulfide bonds, alpha-helicity, and hydrophobic interactions on enhanced proteolytic stability was sought out. Results reveal that all three parameters play an important role on attaining ultrahigh proteolytic resistance, a concept that can be exploited for the development of future peptide therapeutics. The understanding gained through this study will enable this strategy to be tailored to new peptides because the proposed strategy displays substantial tolerance to sequence permutation. It thus appears promising for conveniently creating prodrugs composed entirely of the therapeutic peptide itself (i.e., in the form of a dimer).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据