4.3 Article

Injectable taurine-loaded alginate hydrogels for retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) regeneration

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109787

关键词

Taurine; Sodium alginate; Injectable hydrogel; Retinal pigment epithelium; Tissue engineering

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2017R1A2B3010270]
  2. International Research & Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2017K1A3A7A03089427]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B3010270, 2017K1A3A7A03089427] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study is to produce injectable taurine (Tr)-loaded alginate (Agn) hydrogel for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treatment by inducing the regeneration of RPE (retinal pigment epithelium) cells. Porosity and swelling ratio were measured to evaluate the mechanical properties of the hydrogels, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to evaluate the physical and chemical properties. RPE cells extracted from the pigmented epithelium of rabbits were encapsulated in the Tr/Agn hydrogels. Cells proliferation and migration were improved in Tr/Agn hydrogels with an enhanced expression of RPE-specific genes including RPE65, CRALBP, NPR-A, MITE and collagen type I and II. In vivo tests demonstrated the excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability without inflammatory response by the host when implanted with the hydrogel. Moreover, when the Tr/Agn hydrogels were injected into the sub-retinal space, high adhesion of RPE cells and retinal regeneration were confirmed. These results demonstrated a potential role of injectable Tr/Agn hydrogels as potential therapeutic tools for the treatment of retinal diseases, including AMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据