4.6 Article

Physical and luminescence properties of samarium doped oxide and oxyfluoride phosphate glasses

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 514-522

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.03.016

关键词

Radioluminescence; Judd-Ofelt theory; Oxy-fluoride glasses; CIE chromaticity

资金

  1. Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University [GB_62_12, GB_62_14]
  2. National Research Council of Thailand [GB_62_12, GB_62_14]
  3. Center of excellence in glass and material science Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University Thailand [PD1_2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research work emphasizes on physical and luminescence properties of oxide and oxyfluoride phosphate glasses and discusses the energy transfer between Gd3+ and Sm3+ ions. Lithium gadolinium oxide and oxyfluoride phosphate glasses doped with Sm3+ ions were prepared by conventional melt quenching technique. Subsequently the physical and luminescence properties were investigated systematically to understand their behavior. The density of the prepared glass samples show high in oxide glasses as compared to oxy-fluoride glasses, and the density of both glass samples increase with increase in the Sm2O3 concentrations. In total, ten signature Sm3+ ion peaks were observed in the UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectra. In photoluminescence spectra the oxy-fluoride glass samples show higher excitation and emissions intensity than oxide glasses. The emission intensity increases up to 1mol% concentration of Sm3+ ions and then decreases due to non-radiative energy transfers. The same is observed in case of radioluminescence emission spectra. The calculated J-O intensity parameters show Omega(2) > Omega(4) > Omega(6) trend. From Judd-Ofelt analysis, these glasses exhibit high potential for using as laser host medium. The life time recorded at the excitation and emission wavelength 401 nm and 598 tun respectively and it is observed that the life time decreases with increase in the Sm3+ ions concentration. The CIE

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据