4.7 Article

Microstructure changes in HPT-processed copper occurring at room temperature

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 602-611

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.03.046

关键词

High-pressure torsion (HPT); Ultrafine-grained microstructure; Microstructure stability; 3D-electron back scatter diffraction; Statistical image analysis

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [17-00393J]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, the long-term stability of ultrafine-grained (UFG) copper at room temperature was investigated. The pure copper specimen was processed by 10 revolutions of high-pressure torsion (HPT) at room temperature. This procedure imposes an equivalent strain of about 300 to the material sample. In the region of these large strains, a saturation in grain size refinement occurs. UFG copper, deformed up to the region of microstructure saturation, was subsequently annealed at room temperature for 6 years. Microstructure changes of HPT-processed copper were investigated by means of 2D and 3D electron back scatter diffraction (EBSD) and also by transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the UFG microstructure of copper with saturated HPT-grain sizes coarsens significantly during long-term storage at room temperature. The analysis of grain volumes showed that the boundaries of coarse grains often contain flat segments with the coincidence site lattices (CSL) Sigma 3 and Sigma 9. The misorientation distributions revealed that most boundaries in the annealed microstructure are low energy grain boundaries of these kinds. However, groups of fine grains that are surrounded by random boundaries can also be found in the microstructure. Furthermore, 3D EBSD data were analysed in order to obtain a statistical microstructural information. The microstructure contains a high number of fine grains, but they form only a minority of the investigated volume. Quantitative geometrical characteristics of grain boundaries including CSL were described and interpreted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据