4.5 Article

Morphometric classification of swell-dominated embayed beaches

期刊

MARINE GEOLOGY
卷 411, 期 -, 页码 78-87

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2019.02.004

关键词

Beach morphodynamics; Embayment planform; Geological control; Beach processes; Headlands

资金

  1. Macquarie University Research Training Programme
  2. University of Sydney

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Globally, embayed beaches are common to hilly and mountainous coastlines. They are typically characterised by two headlands that are a primary control on incident wave exposure and beach morphodynamics. Embayed beaches exist under a range of headland morphologies and degree of embaymentisation. Here, we present a generalised embayment morphometric parameter (gamma(e)) which classifies the geomorphological setting of embayed beaches based on the embayment indentation and area. We apply this to 168 swell-dominated embayed beaches from 6 regions using open-access imagery. The embayment morphometric parameter (gamma(e)) was subjected to k-means cluster analysis to identify 4 classes of embayed beaches with increasing gamma(e) indicating greater headland influence and impact on incident wave exposure. The Classes range from 1 to 4 with increasing degree of embayment. The most common is Class 2 (43%, n = 73) which represents embayed beaches that have moderate embayment indentation and headland influence. There are clear trends in embayment geometry regardless of location, wave climate or tidal regimes. Within the embayments, there were 6 possible headland orientations (types H1-H6). The most common (58%, n = 97) is when both headlands are orientated outwards from the beach (H6) and may result in greater morphological beach response from less headland shadowing, compared with headlands orientated inwards onto the beach (H1). In summary, we have developed a simple classification scheme for embayed beaches based on degree of indentation and headland orientation that can be applied to any embayed beach globally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据