期刊
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
卷 103, 期 -, 页码 397-403出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.02.023
关键词
Mudrocks; Compression; Compaction; Liquid limit
资金
- UT Geofluids consortium - Anadarko Petroleum
- BP
- BHP Billiton
- Chevron
- ConocoPhillips
- ExxonMobil
- Hess
- Repsol
- Shell
- Statoil
- Pemex
Four different empirical models used to describe the one-dimensional normal compression behavior of mudrocks have been evaluated by investigating the behavior of 15 different resedimented mudrocks. These mudrocks originate from a wide variety of geologic origins and were tested in the laboratory over an effective stress range of 0.1-100 MPa. The normal compression of silt-rich, low liquid limit mudrocks is best described by assuming a log-linear relationship between vertical effective stress, sigma(v)' and void ratio. For smectite-rich, higher liquid limit mudrocks their behavior is better described by assuming a log-linear relationship between sigma(v)', and porosity. The assumption of a log-log relationship between (1 + void ratio) and sigma(v)' is not the most appropriate for any particular mudrock type, but gives a reasonably good description of compression behavior for all mudrocks, and is therefore ideal for situations in which the general composition of a sediment is unknown. For all mudrocks, the assumption of an exponential relationship between porosity and sigma(v) gives a very poor fit to the experimental data. As mudrocks undergo compression to high effective stresses, high liquid limit mudrocks display a much greater compressibility and a corresponding larger loss in porosity compared to more silt-rich mudrocks. The porosities of all materials tend to converge into a much narrower range above about 10 MPa, where all mudrocks display a similar compression behavior and a constant value of compression index of 0.21 regardless of their composition. At low effective stresses though, their compression behavior is strongly controlled by composition.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据