4.7 Article

3D and Porous RGDC-Functionalized Polyester-Based Scaffolds as a Niche to Induce Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow Stem Cells

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201900049

关键词

degradable polymer; human bone marrow stem cells; poly(l-lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate); RGDC

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [621-2013-3764]
  2. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research [RMA15-0010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyester-based scaffolds covalently functionalized with arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-cysteine (RGDC) peptide sequences support the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of stem cells. The aim is to create an optimized 3D niche to sustain human bone marrow stem cell (hBMSC) viability and osteogenic commitment, without reliance on differentiation media. Scaffolds consisting of poly(lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate), poly(LA-co-TMC), and functionalized poly(lactide) copolymers with pendant thiol groups are prepared by salt-leaching technique. The availability of functional groups on scaffold surfaces allows for an easy and straightforward method to covalently attach RGDC peptide motifs without affecting the polymerization degree. The strategy enables the chemical binding of bioactive motifs on the surfaces of 3D scaffolds and avoids conventional methods that require harsh conditions. Gene and protein levels and mineral deposition indicate the osteogenic commitment of hBMSC cultured on the RGDC functionalized surfaces. The osteogenic commitment of hBMSC is enhanced on functionalized surfaces compared with nonfunctionalized surfaces and without supplementing media with osteogenic factors. Poly(LA-co-TMC) scaffolds have potential as scaffolds for osteoblast culture and bone grafts. Furthermore, these results contribute to the development of biomimetic materials and allow a deeper comprehension of the importance of RGD peptides on stem cell transition toward osteoblastic lineage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据