4.7 Article

Antibacterial activity and mechanism of thymol against Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris vegetative cells and spores

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 377-384

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.01.066

关键词

Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris; Thymol; Antibacterial activity; Mechanism; Spore

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31701720]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2452016085]
  3. Science and Technology Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province, China [2016KTCQ03-12]
  4. Science and Technology Cooperation Projects of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan [2015DFT30130]
  5. Basic Research Program of Science and Technology [2013FY113400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris has received much attention due to its unique thermo-acidophilic property and implication in the spoilage of pasteurized juices. The aim of this study was to investigate the antibacterial characteristics and mechanisms of thymol against A. acidoterrestris vegetative cells and spores. Minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of thymol against vegetative cells were both 0.25 mg/mL. MIC of thymol against spores was 0.5 mg/mL, and the MBC was greater than 1.0 mg/mL. Thymol could effectively inhibit A. acidoterrestris growth, spore germination and guaiacol production. When treated by thymol, the leakage of nucleic acids and proteins from A. acidoterrestris cells and spores increased significantly. SDS-PAGE investigation of bacterial proteins showed that the loss of soluble proteins was obvious as well. Scanning electron microscopy observation exhibited that A. acidoterrestris cells or spores treated with thymol had a severe morphological damage. These results demonstrated that thymol exerted its good antibacterial activities by destroying the integrity of the cell and spore. This study provides a new method for the inactivation of A. acidoterrestris in fruit juice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据