4.5 Article

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of the Exhaled Breath Condensate and Proposal of Dermcidin and S100A9 as Possible Markers for Lung Cancer Prognosis

期刊

LUNG
卷 197, 期 4, 页码 523-531

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00408-019-00238-z

关键词

Biomarker; Exhaled breath condensate; Mass spectrometry; Protein profile

资金

  1. Xunta de Galicia [INCITE 09 916 360 PR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction New sampling techniques to analyse lung diseases, such as exhaled breath condensate (EBC), are a breakthrough in research field since they are less invasive and less traumatic for the patients compared to lung biopsies. Nevertheless, there is an increasing need to optimize not only the sampling protocols but the storage and processing of specimens to get accurate results. Methods Exhaled breath condensate was sampled employing the ECoScreen device. Concentrated protein was obtained after ultracentrifugation, lyophilization and reversed-phase chromatography. MALDI-time of flight (TOF)/TOF mass spectrometry (MS) was applied to determine the protein profile in EBC. Commercially available ELISA kits were used to detect the selected biomarker in the EBC after MALDI-MS proteins identification. Results The obtained EBC volume after two periods of 10 min doubled the amount obtained after 20 min. One hundred peptides were detected by MALDI-MS, and 18 proteins were identified after reversed-phase chromatography concentration. Dermcidin (P81605), S100A9 (P06702) and Cathepsin G (P08311) were selected to be analysed by ELISA. Dermcidin and S100A9 expression were statistically higher in lung cancer versus healthy volunteers. VEGF concentrations decreased, respectively, by 5.94 and 11.42-fold after 1 and 2 years of frozen EBC preservation in parallel with the declined number of proteins identified by MALDI-MS. Conclusion Exhaled breath condensate analysis combined with MS technique may become a valuable method for lung cancer screening and Dermcidin and S100A9 may serve as biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis or prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据